I wonder what new Treaties Kevin Annett will strike with the First Nations people (formerly of Canada) now that this country has been disestablished and dissolved? Certainly he has thought about the ramifications of a Reverend (as I have called him, the Great White Savior) setting up a new Republik on the lands occupied by Anishinaabe, Metis and Cree people? I say ‘occupied’ because only the white man has had a concept of ownership of the land as part of their conquest of it and in doing so created the concept of subjugation.
I ask this question because the wording of Kevin’s latest ‘Proclamation and Declaration’ should leave many people puzzled about what he actually means.
In Witness Thereof, We pledge our mutual lives and our sacred honour, and have hereunto set our hands and signatures and caused to be established the Seal of the Federated Republic of Kanata as a Free Society on the Land, under customary land law jurisdiction. The Constitution of our Republic and this Proclamation are ratified and in effect as of today, Friday, October 31, 2014.
The term “land law jurisdiction” should give further pause given the following information on Land Law:
Land law is the form of law that deals with the rights to use, alienate, or exclude others from land. In many jurisdictions, these kinds of property are referred to as real estate or real property, as distinct from personal property. Land use agreements, including renting, are an important intersection of property and contract law. Encumbrance on the land rights of one, such as an easement, may constitute the land rights of another. Mineral rights and water rights are closely linked, and often interrelated concepts. Land rights are such a basic form of law that they develop even where there is no state to enforce them; for example, the claim clubs of the American West were institutions that arose organically to enforce the system of rules appurtenant to mining. Squatting, the occupation of land without ownership, is a [sic] globally ubiquitous.
Sovereignty of the land is already afforded to Original peoples in a unique form of Alloidal Title known as aboriginal title:
Aboriginal title is a common law doctrine that the land rights of indigenous peoples to customary tenure persist after the assumption ofsovereignty under settler colonialism. The requirements of proof for the recognition of aboriginal title, the content of aboriginal title, the methods of extinguishing aboriginal title, and the availability of compensation in the case of extinguishment vary significantly by jurisdiction. Nearly all jurisdictions are in agreement that aboriginal title is inalienable, except to the national government, and that it may be held either individually or collectively.
Aboriginal title was first acknowledged in the early 19th century, in decisions in which indigenous peoples were not a party. Significant aboriginal title litigation resulting in victories for indigenous peoples did not arise until recent decades. The majority of court cases have been litigated in Australia, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, and the United States. Aboriginal title is an important area of comparative law, with many cases being cited as persuasive authority across jurisdictions. Many commentators believe that the doctrine is applicable in all common law legal systems.
Let me restate this: Aboriginal title is inalienable, except to the national government and that includes a new Federated Republik of Kanata. Inalienable rights are natural rights that cannot be sold, transferred or removed (except by the national government according to the Wikipedia page on Aboriginal Title). And while Kevin has made mention of how the colonial occupation of Native lands occurred and was a terrible thing, he uses it not as an opportunity to ratify those wrongs with his own ‘reparations’ laid out in his Charter, but to reference the land as ‘ours’. Does Colin Sullivan have a provision to address the inherent rights of First Nations people over the rights of the decendant’s of the colonials who stole their ‘vast resources and wealth’? Or will land law jurisdiction be used to exclude the natives from their inalienable rights under the new Republik Government? This begs the question about how many Natives will join this Free Republik? Nevermind how many ‘Free Citizens’ will arrest the Queen and Pope given that the arrest warrants expired earlier this year and that they are forgeries by the soon to be late and great George Dufort LLB? (False identities soon disappear once they’re outed).
Is there no one asking a single ‘hard’ question of this man and his delusional ‘apostles’.
WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE REVEREND?
Kevin has written that the constitution for this grand Republik is to be ratified on the highest occult holiday of the year, Samhain or the Festival of the Dead; Friday, October 31, 2014.
It is indeed strange that a Christian Reverend, who steadfastly maintains that Satanists are at the root of pedophile rings and the evil Transnational Organization called Vatican II, would choose this high holy day for Satanists to ‘seal’ a covenant? And will this ‘historic document’ be signed by Rev. Annett at the Oodena Celebration Circle, one of Winnipeg’s most curious and allegedly pagan/occult sites aside from the Legislature building itself? It’s too bad that signatories can’t embark on Frank Albo’s Hermetic Code tour of the Legislature as part of their pagan initiation into the Republik. They might, if they were Christian, be inclined to change their mind about their new-found ‘freedom’.
Why Winnipeg? If not for it’s occult history and Freemasonic roots?:
“The Legislative Buildings of Manitoba appear to be the only legislative buildings in Canada to embody designs consistent with Masonic architectural principles and occultic/pagan imagery. The location of such a building almost exactly in the center of Canada is believed to be significant and not coincidental.” – See more at: http://www.savethemales.ca/002079.html#sthash.8O4cRKc9.dpuf
But Kevin is a Christian minister, you say! He has a congregational church in South Dakota, where he reads Bible verses from airport payphones for Sunday sermons broadcasted over the internet, you say! And let us not forget that he’s performed three exorcisms in St. Peter’s square in Rome and is crusading against the Satanic Ninth Circle Cult!
Tell me this, (Christian apologists for a New World Order shill), how Christian can a minister be who denies that Jesus Christ ever existed?
In Kevin Annett’s recent interview with Alfred (the Aliens are here to save us!) Webre, Kevin Annett says the following regarding claims that Pope Francis is the ‘false prophet’ of Revelation’s (starting at 38:22):
“When you look at papal history a lot of this is fabricated and it’s used politically by the different factions in Rome and all that, so I would not take these predictions and prophesies literally, that’s a big mistake people make, including in reading the bible.”
“I mean the book of Revelation was written as a, uh, in the politically censored language of the time, uh, they couldn’t refer to Rome, they referred to the beast with 7 heads, you know the seven hills of Rome, things like that. And even in terms of discussion of AntiChrist, the AntiChrist was never seen as a man but as a place, and that’s made clear, uh, you know, all through the Bible and other references to it, that they’re referring to Rome, to the institution of the Empire, not to an individual, so, I really think people need to keep that in mind when they’re listening to the latest (laugh) so called prophet, on these prophesies on this whole issue”.
Aside from being a terrible interviewee who just makes up SH#T as he goes, this is a man who has denied Jesus Christ existed and has denied his apostle John who wrote that:
2 John 1:7 - For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
AntiChrist is not a place as much as Kevin might want it to be, but is a spirit dwelling within those who deny Christ, who work on behalf of Satan and his minions and that the Beast is the utmost indwelling of the AntiChrist spirit whose name is also 666. But Kevin would twist his ‘ministry’ to make it solely about Rome and the Popes and deny that the Bible is the sword of truth. He wants you to believe that a new Promised Land is at hand and that it is within your grasp, but he has a history of letting others do his dirty work, often getting arrested in the process and becoming martyrs to the ITCCS cause. It is a Promised Land that will no doubt feature Kevin as the proverbial Moses – having led people out of their bondage (or is it INTO bondage?) to wander the desert for forty years.
Let those religious followers crying “Bless-you Kevin!” who pray ferverently for the success of this new State, now have eyes to see and ears to hear. And may the Natives seek redress from the Interim President of the Provisional Republik of Kanata (aka. Eagle Strong Voice adopted member of the Turtle, or is it Crane?, clan of the Anishinaabe) where the Canadian Governement has failed to do so. Let’s see Kevin put his money where his mouth is.