If Adam Kokesh has his way, one month and one week from today, on July 4th, there will be armed marches by American citizens on Washington, D.C., and on all 50 state capitals across the United States. (See “Iraq War veteran plans armed march on Washington on July 4,” May 6, 2013; and "Kokesh released from jail; calls for march on 50 state capitals…
I have recently been critical of Heinrik Palmgren of Red Ice Radio for not being more shrewd in his selection of guests, particularly Kevin Annett, who he has had on the show several times in the past few years. This past long weekend, a friend shared a portion of Heinriks most recent show with Frank O’Connell of One-Heaven.org as they discussed Messianic movements, personal responsibility and Public Trusts. She explained to me about how Heinrik did not make judgement calls regarding his guests and that they often were challenged during the interview…some of them crumbling under the weight of hard questioning.
This particular interview was shared with me, because for some time, I had written Heinrick asking him about his support of Kevin Annett and the apparent lack of vetting of Kevin’s story although I really like listening to Red Ice and will have to renew my subscription as soon as my first payment from the FBI comes in… (that’s an inside joke folks..)
While I do no agree with many of the principles being taught at One-Heaven.org, I did find some of what Frank O’Connell had to say to ring true. He spoke (in the short segment I heard) about personal responsibility, and about how we need to stop looking for someone to save us from our problems. He calls it a ‘Messiah Movement’ although I think that there are saviors of many kinds roaming the earth (as ravenous wolves). Kevin has latched on to quite a few of them (Occupy, Jesus Christo – the AntiChrist, the Sovereignty Movement, Communism, Alfred Webre and the Aliens, Residential School Survivors and Satanic Child Sex Slavery). He’s made outlandish claims about dissolving countries, making the Pope resign, being the President of Kanata and worst of all of finding childrens bones in one of the alleged mass graves strewn about the country-side.
I have in the past, called Kevin the Irreverant Reverend, and the Great White Savior, for reasons that Frank O’Connell describes in his interview with Heinrik. For Kevin acts like the Messiah at times, standing quietly in front of a church with a serene smile on his face as he describes how Jesus threw the moneylenders from the Temple. The sick and sad reality is that Kevin calls Christianity a lie… all the while clinging to the use of the term Reverend and keeping his ‘collar’ so the cops will leave him alone. In short, Kevin masquerades as the sole savior to all who flock to his causes. But why do we need Kevin Annett at all? Were we really that ignorant of the issue of abuse within the Churches and at the Residential Schools, or did Kevin just present a story that much more fantastic and horrible and in keeping with the growing paranoia of our conspiracy culture? I believe the latter to be true….
A few years back W5 aired a report on Benny Hinn, the televangelist who casts curses and conduct’s ‘mass healings’ at revivals around the globe. In watching Hinn wave his arms over the crowd (dispatching Satan’s demons into Hell), he carefully remembers to invoke the name of Jesus Christ as he does so. People give these SnakeOil salesman thousands upon thousands of dollars to be healed and Hinn lives in a swanky mansion and has a staff of bodyguards should anyone decide to get him a little closer to God. Kevin, however pleads poverty and has laughingly stated that the Canadian Revenue Association can’t pin anything on him because he doesn’t have an income. People who’ve met him could testify to the fact that he’s poorer than a church-mouse and I believe that to be true. So how exactly does a poverty stricken preacher afford to spend several months (several times a year) flitting off to Europe? It’s a conundrum that leaves plenty of speculation and makes you wonder…”who benefitted”.
If the problem, as O’Connell puts it, is that we are a society that has put more faith in others to solve our problems than we have in ourselves, then we will forever need people like Kevin Annett. We will continue to blindly go along with whatever he says is true because we won’t have faith enough in ourselves to make small changes that can add up to the big changes we are seeking.
Perhaps this is what I found so refreshing in the audio clip I listened to. It was subtle, but you could definitely hear the last vestiges of Kevin’s credibility crumbling as Heinrik spoke his ‘truth’. The fallout from Kevin’s claims of ‘arrest warrants’ and Pope resignations have led people to begin questioning… where few had done so before. It was as if to say, “dead natives are one thing…. but instilling fear in the Pope? You go too far!!!”.
What’s wrong with the crusade that Kevin is on right now? Nothing, except that if we are to truly make a break with the old paradigms, we need to think smaller, much smaller… starting with the very cells of our being. We must realize that the building blocks of life – atoms, elements, molecules, DNA… these fundamental building blocks exist in us all, and that housed within the organized society of cells and tissues is a soul that has no color, religion, class or sexual orientation. That is the common dream of mankind that lurks within us all, waiting for us to let it loose upon the world….
Perhaps that is why O’Connell laughs so deep and heartily over Heinriks remarks about a piece of paper and a declaration of a ‘Tribunal’…. it seems that Kevin is missing the point.
I leave you with the transcribed audio (in portions) and encourage you to subscribe to Red Ice Radio for the full length version of this Interview and others you may find interesting at RedIceRadio.com.
Frank:I do not see the signs that were there, even ten years ago, of some global destruction. I do see the Nihilists under maximum stress, unable to cope and I do see a change towards personal responsibility. So I hope people step up to the mark, wherever they are, whatever they’re doing and whoever they’re working with. More than just simply being entertained, and a passenger on this trip. History is not a spectator sport….. People are looking to be passive. A Messiah movement is not going to solve our problems.
Heinrik: You’re talking about OPPT, One People’s Public Trust right?
Frank: Well yeah, here’s an example, I mean, I’m not going to go into the nitty gritty of it, but that’s one example where they claim, to create trusts….what really got my goat is that someone claims to convey property that they have no authority over. My concern is how quickly and how largely people jumped on this ‘Messianic’ movement, which was basically, “You don’t have to worry, we’ve done all this work…. just trust us!”…. That’s the thing… The SYSTEM perpetuates the ‘Messiah’, the reality is the world we live in today, the New Age we’re seeing unfold is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. If I do not hold myself accountable, If I’m not competent of my own affairs, if my word is not my bond, then no one can save me. No one can help me. And that is really, really hard, very, very hard because it is totally against the image training of consumerism.
Consumerism says…your word is whatever you wish it to be today… totally against what we’ve just said. And yet, the world and the challenge we face is: I must hold myself (to) account, I must be honest, I must be true…. and no one can save me but myself.
Heinrik: Yeah, uh, I’ve wondered why anyone should abide by rules that ultimately…,well, they just was (sic) made up by someone who lived many hundreds of years ago. I see their response may be to claim on other peoples terms or on other peoples playing field, if you will, it’s to a certain degree. a kind of an admission that they have power. I mean, I can write something on a piece of paper that, you know, the Pope is now arrested and my Tribunal says so (Frank laughing)… but it doesn’t make it so. He can walk around freely right? You know to a certain point, we have to kind of realize that what they have done in the world, they have the police forces, they have the armies, the military, ultimately, you know, fighter jets, and atom bombs at their disposal. And we can attempt to fight that old will, there’s a, I think there’s a deeper transformation to have happen.
Frank O’Collins – The Rise of Nihilism & The Apex of World Control
May 16, 2013
Frank’O Collins is an author and futurist having developed over 60 web sites on global issues and solutions. 25 years ago, Frank started collecting and working on the ideas that eventually became UCADIA. Since then, Frank has completed a range of books, patents, and models covering a vast array of subjects. His current focus is finishing the 22 books of Canon law, based on the “Restore the Law Project,” aimed at challenging the root of Roman Vatican law, 500 years since Martin Luther first challenged the authority of the Vatican and its commercial allies. In this program we discuss the Vatican’s new pope, the Jesuits and who is at the apex of the pyramid of control. We’ll discuss the different components of the Illuminati. Then, Frank talks about the rise of nihilism among the elite. Frank explains that the prelate of “The Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem” or “The Knights of Malta” is at the pinnacle of world control. We also speculate about supernatural influences amongst the ranks. In the second hour, we speak more about the Jesuits, the new pope and the Knights of Malta. We focus specifically on the fear of death and how this rules the majority of people. Later, Frank explains that reincarnation was originally a part of the Christian doctrine. At the end, Frank comments on the OPPT (the One People’s Public Trust).
Well, it seems that hard work and determination to expose a liar and a con artist have led to him making a threat of bodily harm on my person. Congratulations Kevin! Your now officially that which you claimed to hate……a Tyrant!
Reply to your comment on: Child Sacrifice and Trafficking in Holland: An Eyewitness speaks out (Introduction)
From: Kevin A, 4 hours ago
Child Sacrifice and Trafficking in Holland: An Eyewitness speaks out (Introduction)
by rich freedomcentral
Well then, I guess you do this dirty work just for the sheer enjoyment of the job, rather than as a paid mercenary, c’est vrai? Just some friendly advice: stopping people like you is now something that’s in the hands of less accomodating people than me. I’d be careful if I were you.
I remember as a kid, when the last Star Wars movie (The Return of The Jedi) came out, George Lucas declared that it was to be the last Star Wars movie he would make. Then after much growing up and having my own children he released Episode 1 which was called something I’d never heard before: A prequel. Jedi was supposed to be good-bye for good… so now I thought “what the hell is a prequel?”. Seems that a story (even if you come in at the middle of it) isn’t as good unless you can explain ‘how it all began’. Most fans seemed thrilled at the idea of three new movies that would give some back-story to what had been the best part of my childhood. I wasn’t so sure, because most of what had made Star Wars so wonderful, whimsical and exciting was that it was new and that the animation techniques (though painstaking and time consuming) where what made it so real and endearing to me. I had to accept that in the 90′s any Star Wars movie was going to be done with computer graphics – CGI – that somehow took the believability out of it. It just wouldn’t be the same.
On the other hand, I could see why George Lucas wanted to make another trilogy…. I mean, Star Wars was such a successful movie that he could bank on anything with that name bringing in the big bucks….For the fans it took the guesswork out of what led up to the original series.
This brings me to why I am writing another article after, I too.. said goodbye.
In the past week, Kevin Annett has released a ‘special report’.. a kind of reworked prequel to the events before, during and after the dig for human remains at Brantford, Ontario (the Mush-Hole). This report, which attempts to answer all those questions people like myself and Greg Renouf have had about the claims made by Kevin Annett in the past.
The claims made in this report have prompted me to ‘come out of retirement’ so-to speak and to raise some questions regarding the finding of bones and the examination of those bones.
Now, many of my detractors, including Kevin himself as well as Marcia Lane and Russ Leitica have argued that the issue of whether or not the bones were found to be animal or human, and what lies Kevin told about Smithsonian, is not the point. What matter’s is that those responsible for the crimes must be punished. However, without the physical evidence there is nothing to prove that a crime occured and Kevin knows this which is why he often confuses that issue. In the ‘report’ he states:
This report is a recapitulation of what was discovered at the Mohawk school, and reminds the world that forensic evidence has now substantiated that the Crown of England, the Vatican and the Canadian government and churches are responsible for the death of more than 50,000 children across Canada.
The key words for me were: FORENSIC EVIDENCE
If we follow through with the logic of the above statement by Kevin, then the existence of ‘forensic evidence’ is enough to prove that a crime was committed. That forensic evidence should demonstrate foul play was involved and should also be used to identify the victim in some fashion to further establish a case against a suspect.
But there is no forensic evidence and therefore no crime so how can there be an accused person found guilty? It would never stand a chance in an actual court of law.
So, let me ask some questions regarding the forensic evidence and see how Kevin’s prequel holds up.
Question 1: What happened at the dig site, Kev?
Kevin Annett states that bone fragments, along with buttons and bits of cloth were unearthed from 12 to 24 inches below the surface. He claims that some of the bone fragments were as large as “four inches in length” and that there were also “several teeth” discovered. Teeth and four inch long bones are excellent sources of forensic evidence.
Many of the bones were described by Annett as being “cut up” which if examined by a forensic pathologist would add to the suspicion of foul play.
The deepest the dig at “Level Two” was 22 inches which is less than two feet deep. This suggests that if a body was buried there that the grave was deep enough to contain the body of a small child for very long. It is likely that wild scavengers would detect the smell of a decomposing corpse at less than two feet and could easily unearth it.
Also, according to Clynt King who conducted the GPR survey and detected a “massive soil dislocation and disturbance” to the areas east of the Mush-Hole building:
“It appears from the radar that at least ten to fifteen feet of soil has been displaced and covered over the original terrain east and southeast of the school building. This is definitely a subsurface anomaly, meaning its earth that was dumped there” – Sept 30, 2011
Geronimo Henry further states:
“None of that mound was there when I was in the Mush Hole (from 1944-1953). It was all flat then. This has all been piled up, right where I saw them digging one night and burying a small kid.”
It is unclear from the report if where the dig occured was anywhere near the area Geronimo Henry states he saw a child buried. If it is, then Ten to 15 feet of soil (according to the witness statements above) potentially cover the buried remains of at least one child (perhaps more), and 22 inches of soil would be barely scratching the surface of a much deeper gravesite.
Question 2: What about the remains unearthed?
As mentioned above, bone fragments, teeth (this is a new claim of Annetts), buttons, pieces of clothing and large intact bones were uncovered from one small plot out of 40 on a grid. The dig was temporarily halted “to allow specialists the chance to analyze and identify the artifacts, and to issue a public statement about what we had unearthed.”
Kevin Annett claims that three forensic specialists were part of the team:
1. Dr. Don Ortner of Smithsonian institution who was allegedly involved in this project from the beginning.
2. Kris Nahrgang (of Trent University)
3. Greg Olson of the Provincial Coroner’s Office.
Re: Dr. Ortner:
It is important to note that this report is the first time that Kevin Annett has claimed that Dr. Don Ortner of the Smithsonian Institution was involved in the dig at Brantford from the beginning. This is interesting for several reasons. First, when Kevin first announced in late August of 2012 that he had sent the bones to Smithsonian, he never mentioned the name of who he had sent them to or when. Then, after writing the Chief Forensic Anthropologist, Dr. Doug Owsley, and publishing his letter, Kevin was alerted by his network that I had written a piece about it and refers to Owsley as ‘the Smithsonian guy’, as if he’s never heard of him before. He even hastens to add his usual “government agents can’t be trusted” rhetoric just to cover his bases:
|On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Marcia Lane wrote:
Kevin, you need to read this article. I have lost all the info I had on Smithsonian contacts but I believe Mr Owsley sounds familiar. Isn’t he the guy I gave you the contact info for to discuss the bones being shipped to them to look at? Some journalist wrote him a letter about you and the mush hole and he responded.
From: Kevin Annett <email@example.com>
To: Marcia Lane
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Bones « Kevin Annett Must Be Stopped: Google Alert – Kevin Annett
Can I get a copy of the Smithsonian guy’s letter?
He works for the government, first point. He evaded me for weeks and then said the bones were animal without providing any evidence to support what he said. That contradicted what Olson and Nahrgang told me and the Mohawks to our faces, ie, that they appeared to be human.
So how do people get from that, that I’m “lying”? The mud slingers’ focus on me is an obvious distraction ploy to draw attention from the fact that the Smithsonian guy is fudging the truth. (As the Smithsonian has done in the past when given Indian bones).
This is all proof that these critics are either feds or doing their job for them. But they sure are trying to slam dunk me eh? A good sign.
Marcia Lane (Kevin’s most loyal supporter and radio show producer) is supposedly the person who gave Kevin the contact information for Dr. Owsley yet neither of them can remember who it was they dealt with… very strange. Notice too, that Kevin says that it’s Dr. Owsley who stated that he evaded Kevin for weeks then said they were animal bones leading me to believe initially that it was indeed Dr. Owsley who Kevin was dealing with. It is only when Kevin reads my article with Dr. Owsleys letter that he states it was Dr. Ortner he dealt with. Kevin states this on a radio show in November of 2012 as being the man who examined the bones and sent an e-mail to Kevin, yet Kevin’s own wife states that “we’ve never dealt with Dr. Don Ortner” in a YouTube comment.
In the report Kevin states that 13 bone fragments were ‘mailed’ to Smithsonian for analysis and that he received a phone call reporting that the remains were too small to be analyzed. Not only does this violate several provincial and federal laws, this contradicts Kevin’s earlier statements that Kris Narghang and Greg Olson looked at a large bone (called a knee socket, despite no such joint existing) that appeared to be anywhere from 90-99% positively human and belonging to a child anywheres from 3-6 years of age. Similar large bones were displayed to the public as early as October of 2011 as evidenced by various YouTube videos and ‘press-releases’ produced by Kevin.
Here is a correspondence between Kevin and myself in late October of 2012 where Kevin offers to show the e-mails to me and to Doug Owsley (where I push the matter of also providing the Bill of Lading as proof of shipment) which leads Kevin to accuse me of helping the child killers:
On 28-Oct-12, at 11:43 PM, Kevin Annett wrote:
Once again you’re totally misrepresenting me and the situation. I did in fact send the bones to the Smithsonian, to another specialist whose emails I am posting on line this week. So while Dog Owsley is obviously not aware of this since it wasn’t his office that received them, I’d appreciate it if you’d try sticking to the facts and not fabricate these fantasies about me.
I’d be happy to send to both you and Doug the real evidence if you’re interested in the truth.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Heather Martin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I’d like you to clarify your purpose in “researching” all this and why you’ve been repeating and circulating provable falsehoods about me, before anything precedes.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Heather Martin <email@example.com> wrote:
Ah, so there’s now a caveat with your offer? Why? The truth is the truth and I think you should be interested in that. If you provide me with the proof you claim you have… Contact name, phone number of your contact at Smithsonian, permit to transport bones out of the country, and the waybill (bill of lading) for whatever courier company you used (scanned of course).. I will print an apology… The falsehoods that are provable rely on you to prove them… so, you have my e-mail and I eagerly await your attachments.
Look, your overt hostility and suspicion is unfounded, and with all the serious work that needs to be done, Heather, I prefer to work with people who are serious about bringing the kids home and bringing to justice their murderers – which doesn’t appear to be you.
Your concerns, real or otherwise, will be answered in the forums that will post all the evidence. Meanwhile, show me and yourself that you’ll go after the child murderers with the same grit that you’re focusing on me. Otherwise, tah tah.
Kevin again re-iterated his statements regarding Dr. Don Ortner during an interview with Santos Bonacci
Re: Greg Olson.
In performing a Google Search for “Greg Olson” and “Coroner’s Office” I found information that alleges Greg Olson is an employee of the Ontario Provincial Police although I find him listed on the Ontario Forensic Pathology Service website as a Forensic Anthropologist. Even more intriguing is that there exists a connection between himself and Kris Narghang prior to the dig at Brantford.
My question is if Greg Olson and Kris Nahrgang are such experts in their field, (remember, Greg Olson, is an employee of the Provincial Forensic Pathology Unit for OFPS) why were they not able to positively identify the bones from the Mush-Hole? Is it because the bones were sent to Vancouver (which is what Kris Narghang alleges in the Investigative report by APTN). In what capacity (officially or otherwise) was he acting during this dig? And how can he still be employed given his apparent incompetence and lack of following the Cemetaries Act? How was it that with Olson’s expertise and connections to local resources that the Smithsonian needed to be involved at all? Are he and Nahrgang involved in a larger conspiracy?
Re: Kris Nahrgang
How profoundly strange that Kevin Annett failed to do his homework regarding Kris Nahrgang and his affiliation with Archaeological Services Inc. Kris Nahrgang, it seems, is an official First Nations liason who regularly mediates and negotiates land deals that are part of suspected burial grounds and who is often making statements that all burial grounds belong to all First Nations people rather than to the individual tribes themselves.
I attach an excerpt mentioning Nahrgang and Olson from a document entitled A Conspiracy to Control Archaeological Sites in Ontario :
See the complete document with letter at the above link.
This is goodbye fair readers!!!!
It has been a wild ride to be sure….a challenge at times and sometimes a tearful and giddy escapade into the world of blogging.
In the past 8 months I have written 88 blog articles about Kevin Annett in hopes of exposing him and the fraud he is perpetuating on the world. Initially, I took it lightly… as an occasional satirical look at the claims being made by Annett.
It heated up when I discovered the huge lies surrounding the Mush Hole bones and his claims about Smithsonian…(The world will NEVER see an e-mail from Dr. Don Ortner from Kevin because it doesn’t exist.)
It was hard to not be angry… to not get caught up in the drama (and yes there was LOTS of drama)… and to not take everything personally.
The drama I speak of had to do with several players in this game… PaganMediaThat Bites (aka Arnell Durocher) who was once a supporter of Kevin who also has a blog, but who has turned on fellow bloggers like Greg Renouf despite our having nothing to do with her site.
Then there was the crazy activities of the Irish Rovers (Deegan et al) who co-opted Pagan’s Facebook page and had the audacity to criticize me and call me a liar….lol….
Nevermind the comments, who were mostly from the US and Vancouver Island who chose to not attack the content of the blog, but instead the blogger.
At 25,000 plus visits to the site to date and the most recent series of name-calling and hypocrisy (all vampiric and spindoctor-y)… I’ve realized that I’ve essentially accomplished what I set out to do… enough people have had the chance to look at what myself and others have written and I don’t have anything left to really write about….
Kevin now has the momentous task of fulfilling his own HYPE about the Tribunal, ITCCS and Kevin’s grandiose claims of forcing the resignation of the Pope…. Nevermind, the 50,000 dead children he promised to bring home…. There’s still THAT hanging over his head…
All in all, the albatross(es) that hang around his neck were all put there by none-other than himself and he will have to answer to the public-politik when he can’t fulfill these claims.
I predict an epic failure of the most humiliating kind (in the area of public opinion) and NO ONE will take this man seriously again. As well, anyone who hitched their wagon to his star will sumarily either go down in flames with him or abandon their posts in a last ditch attempt at self-preservation.
I look forward to watching now from the sidelines the fall of the Annett Empire of Lies.
People like Pagan and Mr. Odonothing and others are free to continue investing their energy in Kevin Annett… but as I see a future of true human service laid out before me, I know that I can choose to leave these lower vibrations of angry and self destructive energies in favor of the higher more loving energy of helping my fellow humane-beings…
To all my critics who tried to take me down by calling me names and uttering threats… you have done me a great service in that you have forced me to examine my own ego and to highlight the value of the wonderful things in my life. I choose not to become you.
To Kevin Annett… I hope that you can someday be free of the demons that plague your life right now… I truly wish you to be happy…in being that way, you could actually become an amazing person. Right now, I only can say thank you for the experience.
Simply coming to this realization… I can’t help but feel like a winner.